As I write this, the nation stirs in
anticipation of UEFA announcing its FFP naughty list i.e. the clubs whose
losses exceed the acceptable threshold.
Various media outlets and, of course, Twitter, are already alive with
suggestions that City and PSG will be found guilty and punished, potentially by
expulsion from European competition.
Now I’ve covered before why FFP is a
ludicrous, scandalous piece of market rigging, designed by and for the
established elite clubs whose various financial shenanigans miraculously seem
to fall outside of the very specific legislation around owner investment. So I won’t labour the point.
What I find interesting is the reaction of
supporters. Not the Arsenal fans,
brainwashed as they are by Wengernomics and their now-immovable moral framework
built around the virtues of revenue maximisation by any means and the shunning
of any form of investment. Their value
system ensures that the “news” of City’s imminent demise is met with puffed out
chests and cries of “about time too”, their only concerns being around leniency
should UEFA fail to disband the club with immediate effect. No, that much was predictable, as are the
similar reactions from fans of the other G14 clubs.
What’s more interesting is the response of
the downtrodden. Those poor souls whose
clubs are now the football equivalent of the various districts in The Hunger
Games. Living in their own worlds,
seemingly unaware and broadly accepting of their place in the world and
comforted by the complete control exerted over them by the plump and satisfied
population of the Capitol.
I read one particularly partisan tweet,
which I now can’t find, from a Coventry fan looking forward to UEFA throwing
the book at City. Now he may just not
like Manchester City. Maybe he was one
of those that stormed the Main Stand at Maine Road in the FA Cup in the
nineties (note to self - do some research at some point and insert the specific
year here, you lazy swine. And look again for that Coventry tweet). But I
suspect it reflects the widely-held view I hear from fans of all manner of
clubs that “sugar daddies” are the bane of our game, the “natural order” has
been distorted and FFP is going to restore sanity for the good of all. Sigh.
So given that they could hardly be more
wrong, why are so many fans in favour of FFP?
Here are three suggestions. Any
more? :
1)
The propaganda
From managers to
chief executives to chairmen. From half-baked
pundits to sanctimonious broadsheet journalists. From UEFA executives to concerned bloggers
with graphs and spreadsheets. Basically
anyone that would like the competitive landscape to be exactly as it was for
the decade prior to City’s takeover is backing FFP, seemingly without feeling
the need to apply even the tiniest amount of dispassionate assessment.
No, it’s time
for that terrible new phenomenon of owner investment that has only emerged in
the last century or so to be stopped.
Football got cozy when the Champions League riches ensured the same
teams succeeded every year and lots of people don’t want that ruined. So they talk about how good FFP will be. And as most folk are simple souls who believe
what they’re told to believe, they buy it entirely. It’s why companies still employ cold-callers. People are gullible.
2)
A rose by any other name
It’s obvious. Do you want fair play? Yes, please. There endeth the analysis for most
people. If the Tories had called the
Poll Tax “Financial Fair Play” there would have been none of that kerfuffle.
3)
FFP is great for most club owners
Reality check. You’re worried about owners that want to put
money INTO a football club. Did you know
all the rest are looking to take money OUT?
Scary eh? So for owners looking
to buy a club, enjoy the ride, extract some dividends and sell for a profit,
FFP looks pretty attractive.
If clubs can’t
invest, the chances of a rival from the division below becoming upwardly-mobile
and pushing you down the food chain are suddenly reduced. So now you can retain the status quo more
easily and when the fans get frustrated at the lack of incoming transfers or
the sales of a star player, you can shrug sincerely and say “Sorry folks. It’s FFP.
My hands are tied”. Particularly
handy for the sort of investors a certain ex-United captain was filmed drinking
with perhaps… So if most of the clubs
are in favour of FFP, it must be a good thing right? Right…?
Be interesting to see if City challenge any ruling dished out by UEFA?
ReplyDeleteHi Carl. The PR stakes are too high, sadly. If UEFA try and curb City's progress again though, they may take a different view...
ReplyDelete